Classification of Collaborative Management Methods
By Dana Blumenthal and Jean-Luc Jannink, 2000, Conservation Ecology 4(2):13 The authors suggest the use of a consistent framework for comparing collaborative management methods, and develop such a framework based on five criteria: participation, institutional analysis, simplification of the natural resource, spatial scale, and stages in the process of natural resource management. They apply this framework to six of the more commonly cited methods: soft systems analysis, adaptive management, ecosystem management, agroecosystem analysis, rapid rural appraisal and participatory rural appraisal.
https://www.biodiversitylinks.org/library/resources/rmp/library/content/tools/biodiversity-conservation-tools/putting-conservation-in-context-cd/adaptive-management-resources/5-a.pdf/view
https://www.biodiversitylinks.org/library/resources/rmp/library/content/tools/biodiversity-conservation-tools/putting-conservation-in-context-cd/adaptive-management-resources/5-a.pdf/@@download/image/image.png
File
Classification of Collaborative Management Methods
By Dana Blumenthal and Jean-Luc Jannink, 2000, Conservation Ecology 4(2):13 The authors suggest the use of a consistent framework for comparing collaborative management methods, and develop such a framework based on five criteria: participation, institutional analysis, simplification of the natural resource, spatial scale, and stages in the process of natural resource management. They apply this framework to six of the more commonly cited methods: soft systems analysis, adaptive management, ecosystem management, agroecosystem analysis, rapid rural appraisal and participatory rural appraisal.
